Untitled
Yes girl spill that truth tea
Anonymous

thatdudeemu:

I’m a man though :( a manly man!

Awww lol

theafrocentrics:

Speak Tré! YASS!!

My bussy is all for tre Melvin!!!

theafrocentrics:

Speak Tré! YASS!!

My bussy is all for tre Melvin!!!

You saying you hate white people is racist whether you realize it or not?
Anonymous

black--lamb:

Did you know that if you hold your thumb while sucking dick it does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! Somebody lied to me!! 😤😤

They lied to me to, I tryed that shit the other night and still gagged! !

yarrahs-life:

MON MON!

If you have a crush on me, anonymously tell me why.
Color my Inbox?

zkriesse:

Deep Red - I’m in love with you.

Red - I love you.

Pink - I think you’re cute.

Blue - You’re amazing.

Rose - You’re pretty

Purple - You’re hot.

Plum - I would sex you.

Violet - I would date you.
Aqua - I could stay on your blog for hours.

Lavender - You are my tumblr crush.

Orange - I want to get to know you.

Tangerine - We have a lot in common.

Amber - I wish you would notice me.

Cream - I don’t talk to you but I really love your blog.

(via ig: wvr.thy)
(via ig: wvr.thy)
inmydreamsperhaps:

postracialcomments:


I ain’t tryna start nuffin’ but… this whole idea that black men love white chicks (to the exclusion of black women)—that once a black man gets some substantial Negro-pennies he’s leaving the sista and finding himself a white chick to share his wealth with—might be true for many stars and athletes, but for the average brotha, a chance encounter with a white woman is usually incidental.


Like, most black guys don’t really seek out the pink toes white women and those few that do are just on that self-loathing bullshit!

As a man who’s dined at the table of many nations of women on the earth, I can say that no woman cooks as good as the black woman! (And I ain’t talumabout food either!) I don’ had some extraordinary cooking—including some Caucasian women that put it down with the best of them (sistas)! I think every young black man should indulge in some white chick stank-box before he settles down. Indeed! Many of the stereotypes and mythos surrounding white women are true!



I ain’t here to lie on my hang-low! The first white chick I seriously date—after a month of methodical brainwashing and applying that bozack penile injection, she was ready to sell the farm and elope with a nigga! We ended up having an 8-year relationship that included ménage a trios (with other chicks) and allowing me to have chicks on the side, just as long as daddy came home.


Like any good sociologist/historian who examines the past and the proclivities of different racial groups, black men have reason to be attracted and drawn to white women. This shit is deeper than “Jungle Fever” and exploring racial taboos! This black-man-white-woman thingy is rooted in slavery and has been ingrained in the DNA and psyche of the black man since 1555 (or whenever the first captives were taken from Africa!) Did you know that there was a time when the black man wanted nothing more than his African Queen? And then, white women threw that thang-thang on him and the po’ brovah tain’t neva looked back!


Virginia. 1750. The Auction Block. Ten strong Mandingo warriors draped in nothing but loincloths, ripped muscles, glistening with sweat, standing before a crowd of potential slave masters, as they bid on these black bucks. Mr. Charlie (the white man) surveys his stock for the strongest of the bunch, not knowing that his wife, his sister and his daughter gaze at the slaves from afar, but not as servants—as sexual brute beasts, capable of bringing a woman to maximum climate with the tool, which is hidden behind their loincloth. The word has gotten around that these African men possess a member that is gianormous in comparison to the slave master’s.


Straightway, Southern white women, in droves, flocked to the black man for sexual satisfaction and gratification. This is the untold and unspoken history of the antebellum South, which gave rise to such movements as the “Knights of the Ku Klux Klan” as seen in such movies as D.W. Griffith’s “The Birth of a Nation” (ca. 1915). White fear of the mythical (and in many cases, real) big, black dick phallus spread throughout the South.


Black men, in slavery times were put in a difficult and precarious position; Give up the dick to “Miss Ann” (the white woman) behind her husband’s back or suffer the wrath of the slave master when Miss Ann reported to her husband that a slave had leered at her in a sexually suggestive way—all because he wasn’t trying to tap dat ass!


Yes! We are quite aware of the slave master’s penchant for that big-ol’ “Hottentot Venus” ass that black women toted around the plantation. The white man’s lust for black women is unparalleled—thoroughly documented all the way back to Thomas Jefferson, who wasraping fucking the bejesus out of his slave wench, Sally Hemings, whom he impregnated and had several “suckers” (babies) with. But there has been a curious hush-hush on the sexual interactions of black men and white women during this period, so I’m-a let historian Lerone Bennett Jr. give it to you, straight, no chaser, lest you think I’m fabricating history to make excuses for this modern-day black man/white woman dynamic.


And you thought it was only white men raping black women in slavery times! They don’t wanna talk too loud about the white woman’s desire for black slave meat because history wants to preserve Miss Ann (da white chick) as the symbol of (white) womanhood.


Back in slavery times, trust when I tell you that black men were beating the brakes offMiss Ann’s stank-box—many times, in retribution for the master having his way with the slave’s wife or daughter. Splitting a white woman down to the white meat Having sex with white women was the black man’s way of retaining some sense of dignity and more importantly, his manhood, given his “shit-uation.”


Ask any black man today how does he get over lost love? I’ll tell you! He goes out and finds another chick and screws her with bad intentions and reckless abandonment! He really wants to wreak havoc on her love hole! So imagine how the slave felt when he saw his wife or daughter go into the master’s quarters for an all-nighter!


Screwing the white woman was his way of exacting revenge. It was an act of rebellion! 


I mean, I can’t even lie! I’ve been in some white stank-boxes and had fantasies of screwing in retaliation for my ancestors—for all the black women who were raped by the slave master and while “said” white woman thought I was just this fantastic long-winded black lover—in my mind, I was punishing her for the sins of her forefathers. Any black men know what I’m talumabout? If I can feel this way 160 years removed from physical slavery, just imagine being in the moment—in some white vagina circa 1850? Smh.


I contend that those white chicks from slavery times started this shit (miscegenation aka Jungle Fever), but brothas finished it! White chicks been on black men’s cocks! 
The mythos and stereotypes about black men and white women are true! A stereotype is a generalization, not a concrete finite fact. Black people are a rhythmic people. Who’s gonna debate that? (Yes, I know some black people who have no rhythm!) It is a true stereotype about black people. Now heap on all those other stereotypes about black men having large phalluses and white women being sexually freaking and you have the makings of sexual attraction that must be explored—by both!


I AM COMPLETELY CONFUSED 
WHAT THE HELL ALLHIPHOP?
Source

Um…what?!?!

Ummm,Jesus,Buda,Allah please come and fix these niggas!!!

inmydreamsperhaps:

postracialcomments:

I ain’t tryna start nuffin’ but… this whole idea that black men love white chicks (to the exclusion of black women)—that once a black man gets some substantial Negro-pennies he’s leaving the sista and finding himself a white chick to share his wealth with—might be true for many stars and athletes, but for the average brotha, a chance encounter with a white woman is usually incidental.

Like, most black guys don’t really seek out the pink toes white women and those few that do are just on that self-loathing bullshit!

As a man who’s dined at the table of many nations of women on the earth, I can say that no woman cooks as good as the black woman! (And I ain’t talumabout food either!) I don’ had some extraordinary cooking—including some Caucasian women that put it down with the best of them (sistas)! I think every young black man should indulge in some white chick stank-box before he settles down. Indeed! Many of the stereotypes and mythos surrounding white women are true!

I ain’t here to lie on my hang-low! The first white chick I seriously date—after a month of methodical brainwashing and applying that bozack penile injection, she was ready to sell the farm and elope with a nigga! We ended up having an 8-year relationship that included ménage a trios (with other chicks) and allowing me to have chicks on the side, just as long as daddy came home.

Like any good sociologist/historian who examines the past and the proclivities of different racial groups, black men have reason to be attracted and drawn to white women. This shit is deeper than “Jungle Fever” and exploring racial taboos! This black-man-white-woman thingy is rooted in slavery and has been ingrained in the DNA and psyche of the black man since 1555 (or whenever the first captives were taken from Africa!) Did you know that there was a time when the black man wanted nothing more than his African Queen? And then, white women threw that thang-thang on him and the po’ brovah tain’t neva looked back!

Virginia. 1750. The Auction Block. Ten strong Mandingo warriors draped in nothing but loincloths, ripped muscles, glistening with sweat, standing before a crowd of potential slave masters, as they bid on these black bucks. Mr. Charlie (the white man) surveys his stock for the strongest of the bunch, not knowing that his wife, his sister and his daughter gaze at the slaves from afar, but not as servants—as sexual brute beasts, capable of bringing a woman to maximum climate with the tool, which is hidden behind their loincloth. The word has gotten around that these African men possess a member that is gianormous in comparison to the slave master’s.

Straightway, Southern white women, in droves, flocked to the black man for sexual satisfaction and gratification. This is the untold and unspoken history of the antebellum South, which gave rise to such movements as the “Knights of the Ku Klux Klan” as seen in such movies as D.W. Griffith’s “The Birth of a Nation” (ca. 1915). White fear of the mythical (and in many cases, real) big, black dick phallus spread throughout the South.

Black men, in slavery times were put in a difficult and precarious position; Give up the dick to “Miss Ann” (the white woman) behind her husband’s back or suffer the wrath of the slave master when Miss Ann reported to her husband that a slave had leered at her in a sexually suggestive way—all because he wasn’t trying to tap dat ass!

Yes! We are quite aware of the slave master’s penchant for that big-ol’ “Hottentot Venus” ass that black women toted around the plantation. The white man’s lust for black women is unparalleled—thoroughly documented all the way back to Thomas Jefferson, who wasraping fucking the bejesus out of his slave wench, Sally Hemings, whom he impregnated and had several “suckers” (babies) with. But there has been a curious hush-hush on the sexual interactions of black men and white women during this period, so I’m-a let historian Lerone Bennett Jr. give it to you, straight, no chaser, lest you think I’m fabricating history to make excuses for this modern-day black man/white woman dynamic.

And you thought it was only white men raping black women in slavery times! They don’t wanna talk too loud about the white woman’s desire for black slave meat because history wants to preserve Miss Ann (da white chick) as the symbol of (white) womanhood.

Back in slavery times, trust when I tell you that black men were beating the brakes offMiss Ann’s stank-box—many times, in retribution for the master having his way with the slave’s wife or daughter. Splitting a white woman down to the white meat Having sex with white women was the black man’s way of retaining some sense of dignity and more importantly, his manhood, given his “shit-uation.”

Ask any black man today how does he get over lost love? I’ll tell you! He goes out and finds another chick and screws her with bad intentions and reckless abandonment! He really wants to wreak havoc on her love hole! So imagine how the slave felt when he saw his wife or daughter go into the master’s quarters for an all-nighter!

Screwing the white woman was his way of exacting revenge. It was an act of rebellion! 

I mean, I can’t even lie! I’ve been in some white stank-boxes and had fantasies of screwing in retaliation for my ancestors—for all the black women who were raped by the slave master and while “said” white woman thought I was just this fantastic long-winded black lover—in my mind, I was punishing her for the sins of her forefathers. Any black men know what I’m talumabout? If I can feel this way 160 years removed from physical slavery, just imagine being in the moment—in some white vagina circa 1850? Smh.

I contend that those white chicks from slavery times started this shit (miscegenation aka Jungle Fever), but brothas finished it! White chicks been on black men’s cocks! 

The mythos and stereotypes about black men and white women are true! A stereotype is a generalization, not a concrete finite fact. Black people are a rhythmic people. Who’s gonna debate that? (Yes, I know some black people who have no rhythm!) It is a true stereotype about black people. Now heap on all those other stereotypes about black men having large phalluses and white women being sexually freaking and you have the makings of sexual attraction that must be explored—by both!

I AM COMPLETELY CONFUSED 

WHAT THE HELL ALLHIPHOP?

Source

Um…what?!?!

Ummm,Jesus,Buda,Allah please come and fix these niggas!!!

bisexualskies:

sacredsexualities:

[Image: Dr. Herukhuti in rainbow dashiki with the quote, “Dr. Herukhuti on Sexual Imperialism.”]

Dr. Herukhuti on Sexual Imperialism & Homonormativity:

"Sexual imperialism is manifested in a number of ways in the history of European colonialism. It has meant that non-European people have been the targets of European fantasy; projected desires; guilt and shame; and scientific surveillance and experimentation. People of European descent have placed our genitalia on display, experimented upon our bodies, created theories of sexuality based upon the perceived differences between us and them, etc.
In the contemporary moment, sexual imperialism also looks like the campaigns the U.S. religious right has fermented in Africa to encourage religious intolerance toward homosexuality. It also looks like what Professor Ibrahim Farajajé calls “rainbow flag imperialism” — a sexual imperialism in which LGBT people of European descent direct campaigns into Africa to encourage queer folks in Africa to adopt Western ways of being queer. This is how homonormativity is created, perpetuated, and maintained.
Both the U.S. religious right and the mainstream LGBT movement tend to ignore the indigenous forms of sexual and gender diversity that have existed in Africa for millennia.. The religious right’s efforts depend upon the colonial roots that Christian missionaries planted in Africa centuries earlier. The mainstream LGBT movement’s efforts depend upon the neoliberal capitalist roots planted by multinational corporations and NGO missionaries decades earlier.
So we now have zealot African Christian converts leading the intolerance and violence against other Africans, using the language of indigeneity and authenticity but based upon their indoctrination into Western forms of Christianity. And Africans in urban settings who may be invested in Westernization and looking for models of queerness outside of traditional forms because of the ways Western forms of queerness are promoted in Western-controlled popular media. In both cases, you have people of European descent telling African people what is and is not good for them.
One of the main conflicts between Western homosexuality and African cultural values is about procreation. African cultures value children for a number of reasons. And people have responsibilities to the community to produce children. Western homosexuality poses a threat to those responsibilities, particularly for people who do not have access to the wealth and privilege of Western technologies to produce children outside of reproductive sex. Bisexuality, the ability to be sexually open or engaged with people across a number of genders, does not pose those same challenges to the responsibilities that African people have. Historically, bisexuality has been practiced in Africa in a variety of forms. Because Western bisexuals and people of African descent in the West have been traditionally marginalized by mainstream gay activists, the bisexual aspects of African sexualities have either been mislabeled “gay” (i.e., bi-erasure) or have been ignored (i.e., bi-invisibility).”

Why bi-erasure is so entrenched and pervasive?

"I think bi-erasure is so entrenched and pervasive because of the strategy of mainstream Western gay movement activists. Their strategy was to promote a representation of queerness that was not queer in the ways queerness means “different” or “askew.”
Their strategy was an assimiliationist agenda. They chose to pursue an agenda to make heterosexuals believe that queer people were just like them. To do so, they had to make queer people appear just like heterosexuals but, too often, they were willing to settle for making all queer people appear to be just like gay, middle-class men of European descent.
This kind of work meant that mainstream Western gay movement activists had an ideological and strategic motivation to engage in bi-erasure, respectability politics, and whitewashing.
They continue to be informed by that motivation, which is why you see no mention of polyamorous relationships in mainstream marriage equality materials, bisexual people prominently positioned in HIV prevention policy decision-making, or bisexual or trans people in leadership positions at any national organization that is supposed to serve LGBT people — and definitely no bisexual or trans people of color in senior leadership/management positions.”

[Dr. Herukhuti for One+Love.]

bisexualskies:

sacredsexualities:

[Image: Dr. Herukhuti in rainbow dashiki with the quote, “Dr. Herukhuti on Sexual Imperialism.”]

Dr. Herukhuti on Sexual Imperialism & Homonormativity:

"Sexual imperialism is manifested in a number of ways in the history of European colonialism. It has meant that non-European people have been the targets of European fantasy; projected desires; guilt and shame; and scientific surveillance and experimentation. People of European descent have placed our genitalia on display, experimented upon our bodies, created theories of sexuality based upon the perceived differences between us and them, etc.

In the contemporary moment, sexual imperialism also looks like the campaigns the U.S. religious right has fermented in Africa to encourage religious intolerance toward homosexuality. It also looks like what Professor Ibrahim Farajajé calls “rainbow flag imperialism” — a sexual imperialism in which LGBT people of European descent direct campaigns into Africa to encourage queer folks in Africa to adopt Western ways of being queer. This is how homonormativity is created, perpetuated, and maintained.

Both the U.S. religious right and the mainstream LGBT movement tend to ignore the indigenous forms of sexual and gender diversity that have existed in Africa for millennia.. The religious right’s efforts depend upon the colonial roots that Christian missionaries planted in Africa centuries earlier. The mainstream LGBT movement’s efforts depend upon the neoliberal capitalist roots planted by multinational corporations and NGO missionaries decades earlier.

So we now have zealot African Christian converts leading the intolerance and violence against other Africans, using the language of indigeneity and authenticity but based upon their indoctrination into Western forms of Christianity. And Africans in urban settings who may be invested in Westernization and looking for models of queerness outside of traditional forms because of the ways Western forms of queerness are promoted in Western-controlled popular media. In both cases, you have people of European descent telling African people what is and is not good for them.

One of the main conflicts between Western homosexuality and African cultural values is about procreation. African cultures value children for a number of reasons. And people have responsibilities to the community to produce children. Western homosexuality poses a threat to those responsibilities, particularly for people who do not have access to the wealth and privilege of Western technologies to produce children outside of reproductive sex. Bisexuality, the ability to be sexually open or engaged with people across a number of genders, does not pose those same challenges to the responsibilities that African people have. Historically, bisexuality has been practiced in Africa in a variety of forms. Because Western bisexuals and people of African descent in the West have been traditionally marginalized by mainstream gay activists, the bisexual aspects of African sexualities have either been mislabeled “gay” (i.e., bi-erasure) or have been ignored (i.e., bi-invisibility).”

Why bi-erasure is so entrenched and pervasive?

"I think bi-erasure is so entrenched and pervasive because of the strategy of mainstream Western gay movement activists. Their strategy was to promote a representation of queerness that was not queer in the ways queerness means “different” or “askew.”

Their strategy was an assimiliationist agenda. They chose to pursue an agenda to make heterosexuals believe that queer people were just like them. To do so, they had to make queer people appear just like heterosexuals but, too often, they were willing to settle for making all queer people appear to be just like gay, middle-class men of European descent.

This kind of work meant that mainstream Western gay movement activists had an ideological and strategic motivation to engage in bi-erasure, respectability politics, and whitewashing.

They continue to be informed by that motivation, which is why you see no mention of polyamorous relationships in mainstream marriage equality materials, bisexual people prominently positioned in HIV prevention policy decision-making, or bisexual or trans people in leadership positions at any national organization that is supposed to serve LGBT people — and definitely no bisexual or trans people of color in senior leadership/management positions.”

[Dr. Herukhuti for One+Love.]